Forcing moves are actions that severely limit an opponent’s responses, such as checks, captures, and direct threats. Because the opponent has little or no choice, forcing moves allow you to calculate accurately and take control of the position. The examples below show how forcing moves are used to win material, create decisive attacks, or transition into winning tactics.
1. Baumegger vs. Ragger
Baumegger, S vs. Ragger, M
1...Qxh2+
1...Qxh2+ {white resigned because of} 2.Kxh2 Rh6+ 3.Kg3 Bh4+ 4.Kh3 Bxf2++
2. Bellon Lopez vs. Ask
Bellon Lopez, J vs. Ask, J
1...Ra2+
1...Ra2+ 2.Kxa2 Qxc2+ 3.Ka1 Ra8+ 4.Qa4 {white resigned} Rxa4+ 5.bxa4 Qa2 mate
3. Bishop pair
Riemann vs. Anderssen
1...Qxf3+
1...Qxf3+ 2.gxf3 Bh3+ 3.Kf2 (3.Kg1 Re1+ 4. Kf2 Bh4#) Bh4+ 4.Kg1 Re1+ 5.Qf1 Rxf1++
4. Hausler vs. Tarrasch
Hausler vs. Tarrasch
1...Rh1+
1...Rh1+ 2.Kxh1 Qxh3+ 3.Nh2 3...Ng3+ and white resigned as his Q is lost
5. King in a tight spot
Unzicker vs. Dankert
1...Qg3+
1...Qg3+ 2.Rxg3 (2.Kh1 Qxf3 3.gxf3 Nf2+) 2...hxg3+ 3.Kh1 Nf2++
6. Minor pieces rule!
Papas vs. Oreopoulos
1.Nxd6+
1.Nxd6+ {wins the Q by} 1...Nbxd6 2.Bxd5+ or (1...Nfxd6 2.Bxd5+)
7. Never resign a won position (13)
Rijnsbergen vs. v. d. Weijden
1....Kxg7
1....Kxg7 2. Qxf6+ Kg8 3. Nh6+ Qxh6 4. Qxh6 Ne2+ 5. Kh1 Rxf1++
8. Reinderman vs. Brandenburg
Reinderman vs. Brandenburg
1.Rh8+
1.Rh8+ Kf7 2.Bg6+ {black resigned} Rxg6 3.R1h7+ Rg7 (4.Rxg7) 4.Qxg7 mate
9. Sharma vs. Madhukiran
Sharma vs. Madhukiran
1.Qxb8+
1.Qxb8+ {black resigned} Nxb8 2.Nb6 mate {note also Nb6+ is also winning but takes significantly longer}
10. Turning the tables
Adams vs. Reshevsky
1...Qxf1+
1...Qxf1+ 0-1 (2. Kxf1, Bb5+ 3.Bd3, Bxd3+ 4. Kg1, Re1++)
11. Recovering material
Janakiev vs. Jicman
1...Rxg1+
1...Rxg1+ 0-1 (2. Kxg1, Rxc1+ 3. Kf2, Rc2+ etc.)
12. Amonatov vs. Timofeev
Amonatov vs. Timofeev
1.Nxf7+
1.Nxf7+ Kh7 (1...Kxh5 2.Rh1+ Qh4 3.Qg5) 2.Qg6+ Nxg6 3.hxg6+ Kxg7 4.Bh6+ Kf6 5.Rdf1+
13. Anon vs. Blackburne
Anon vs. Blackburne
1...Rxg2+
1...Rxg2+ 2.Kh1 2...Rxh2+ 3.Kxh2 3...Rh6+ 4.Qh5 Rxh5+ 5.Kg1 Rh1 mate
14. Danger of undevelopment
Ostropolovski vs. Ivanovski
1.Qxd7+
1. Qxd7+, Rxd7 2. Nc7+, Rxc7 3. Rd8++
15. Lilienthal vs. Nezhmetdinov
Lilienthal vs. Nezhmetdinov
1...Qxh3+
1...Qxh3+ 2.Kxh3 Rh8+ 3.Kg2 Rh2+ 4.Kf3 Ne5+ 5.Ke4 f5+ 6.Rxf5 gxf5 mate
16. Never resign a won position (12)
Dekhanov vs. K.
1.g4+
1. g4+ fxg4+ 2. Nxg4+ g5 (2... Rc5 3. Nf6+ Qxf6 4. Qe2#) 3. Qe8+ Qg6 4. Nf6#
17. Vucinic vs. Carnic
Vucinic vs. Carnic
1.Nxb4!
1.Nxb4! {wins a piece} Rxd2? 2.Re8+ Kh7 3.Be4+ {black resigned} g6 4.Rh8 mate
18. Carlsen vs. Shirov
Carlsen vs. Shirov
1.Kg3
1.Kg3 Ra5 2.Bg6+ Kg5 {black resigned} 3.f4+ (3.h4+ gxh3 4.f4 mate) 3...gxf3 4.h4 mate
19. Kasparov (blindfold) vs. Mephisto
Kasparov vs. Mephisto
1.Rxg7+
1.Rxg7+ Kxg7 2.Bh6+ Kh8 3.Bg7+ Kxg7 4.Qg5+ Kf8 5.Qh6+ Ke8 6.Bg6+ Kd8
20. Maki Uuro vs. Jones
Maki Uuro vs. Jones
1...Rd1+
1...Rd1+ 2.Kh2 Rh1+ {white resigned} 3.Kxh1 Qf1+ 4.Kh2 Qxg2 mate
21. Marks vs. Mortensen
Marks vs. Mortensen
1...Qe3+
1...Qe3+ 2.Kh1 Ng3+ 3.hxg3 Rf6 and white resigned as ...Rh6 will mate.
22. Meskovs vs. Angskog
Meskovs vs. Angskog
1.Nxd5
1.Nxd5 Qxd2 2.Ba6+ Kd8 3.Bc7+ (3.Rb8+ Nxb8 4.Rxb8+ Kd7 5.Bc8+ Ke8 6.Bxe6#)
23. Popov vs. Petkov
Popov vs. Petkov
1.Rxf7!
1.Rxf7! Qxd2 2.Rxf8+ {black resigned} Rxf8 3.Ne7+ Kh8 4.Rxf8+ Bg8 5.Rxg8++
24. Simple combination
NN vs. NN
1.Rxg7+
1.Rxg7+ Nxg7 2.Qf7+ Kh8 3.Qf8+ Rxf8 4.Rxf8++
25. Svenn vs. Kinnmark
Svenn vs. Kinnmark
1.Qf5!
1.Qf5! threatens both Qxd7 and Qxh7 mate and if 1...Qxf5 2.Nf7#